|

September 2006
NORA Bi-Monthly
Meeting
On Monday, September 11, 2006 National Organizations Responding
to AIDS (NORA) held its bi-monthly meeting at the American Public
Health Institute in Washington D.C. The meeting included updates
of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Budget and the Ryan White CARE Act
Reauthorization, given by Donna Crews, Director of Government
Affairs AIDS Action. Donna’s Updates were accompanied by a discussion
of microbicide and vaccine developments both in legislation and
scientific research. Speakers included Anna Forbes, Deputy Director
of The Global Campaign for Microbicides, and Peg Willingham, Senior
Director of Public Sector Development and the International AIDS
Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) and NORA Executive Committee member.
Peg Willingham presented first. As she began
her presentation entitled, “The Road to an AIDS Vaccine,” she
stressed the importance of pairing treatment and prevention together
as we fight the AIDS epidemic. She went on to explain that vaccines
are an essential part of prevention. They are non-controversial
prevention pieces in comparison to other methods. She said, “While
finding a vaccine that is 100% effective, covers every transmission
route, and would be easily accessible is ideal, it is a very difficult
challenge. But is finding an HIV vaccine possible? Yes.”
Ms. Willingham pointed out that Merck is currently
the only pharmaceutical company actually investing shareholders’
dollars into research of an HIV vaccine. They are looking at a
cell mediated vaccine, one which hopes to trigger the immune system
to fight off infection. She said that Merck expects to release
the data from this trial in 2008. IAVI and several other governments
are continuing to research cell mediated vaccines as well as a
traditional antibody vaccine.
She feels that after the International AIDS
Conference, political commitment to prevention and vaccine research
is high. It is the hope of IAVI that the conference may stimulate
more capital interest and investment into vaccine research. Currently
the vast majority of investments in vaccines have come from the
public sector, with little commercial support.
She stated that funding is the critical issue.
The nature and science of the HIV disease makes vaccine research
extremely costly. She affirmed that there are currently 30 clinical
vaccine trials taking place throughout the world, and only one
has made it through Phase 3. While the vaccine did not prove effective,
Ms. Willingham believes the trial itself proved to be a success.
It showed that a clinical Phase 3 trial can take place in the
developing world. She said, “IAVI has shown that these complicated
scientific trials can take place in Africa and can have a skilled
work force with world class facilities.” For more information
on the work that IAVI does please visit www.iavi.org.
Anna Forbes spoke next on Microbicides. She
commented on how fitting it was to pair a conversation about microbicides
and vaccines at the same NORA meeting. She believes they are two
similar topics with new awareness and enthusiasm in the wake of
Toronto.
Ms. Forbes first shared some statistics. In
Sub-Sahara Africa 77% of the 9 million HIV positive youth (ages
15-25) are women. In the United States 56% of all adolescent HIV
infections reported are among girls. AIDS is the leading cause
of death in African American women ages 24-34. She said, “In light
of these statistics, women are in dire need of a prevention method
they can control.”
Ms. Forbes then gave an overview of products
in the microbicide pipeline. There are currently 5 products in
Phase 3 trials expecting to release their clinical data by 2008.
The most promising is Carigard®, which may be available by
2010, but most likely not in the United States due to its 50-60%
efficacy. Most of these first line products may have a contraceptive
effect. There are currently 9 products in Phase 1 trials and 10-20
still being studied in the lab. The second and third generation
microbicides in Phase 1 and 2 are products from anti-retrovirals
which have the potential to have increased efficacy and decreased
contraceptive capabilities.
Ms. Forbes said that most of the funding for
these trials is coming from small bio-technology companies, non-profits,
and academic institutions. Big pharmaceutical companies have not
invested in microbicides, and there is a serious lack of public
funding for this research. She explained that microbicide trials
are actually cheaper than the drug development process of many
other medications; however they are far more difficult to conduct.
She explained that because microbicide trials are prevention trials,
they must prove a negative while enrolling very large numbers
to do so. As of 2005, $140 million had been invested in microbicide
research. She said, “An additional $106 million is needed for
microbicide research to be adequately funded.”
The Global Campaign for Microbicides promotes
microbicide advocacy across organizations, demands the resources
from Congress to make microbicides a reality, and encourages an
increase in private investment for microbicide research. The Global
Campaign for Microbicides is pushing passage of the Microbicide
Development Act which could give increased money to NIH for microbicide
research and require NIH to form a Microbicide Development branch
to streamline the development research. This Act has been introduced
in the last 6 Congresses without passage, but is gaining support
each time. Please visit www.global-campaign.org/legislativeadvocacy.htm
to find information you can use to urge your legislator to support
the Microbicide Development Act.
Lastly, Ms. Forbes spoke on the potential
public health impact of microbicides. She shared the data analysis
that if a microbicide that is only 60% effective was offered to
73 low income countries and used by 20% of the people in that
country reached by the health care system during only 50% of their
unprotected sexual acts, 2.5 million HIV infections could be averted
over the next three years. This proves the enormous HIV prevention
gap in the developing world. |